People who make more and less don’t always plan well for emergencies

I don’t think people should be penalized because they make 200k. Unless they don’t have to pay it back. If we have to set a number, 150k is far too low. I would agree with $1 million as a round number.

In response to this post by BigDave

Posted: 03/25/2020 at 11:21AM

I don’t get these federal limits for federal charity -- WestyHokie 03/25/2020 10:08AM

Unless I end up losing my job, I don't want any free money from the feds ** -- Apex-Hokie 03/25/2020 12:08PM

No time to do a detailed needs based assessment ** -- BleedinOandM 03/25/2020 11:33AM

Heck with needs based, just set it at 500k -- WestyHokie 03/25/2020 3:55PM

That discussion would get way too political, and delay folks getting $$$. -- Hokie360 03/25/2020 11:27AM

Its being done wrong, IMHO -- Beerman 03/25/2020 11:16AM

That makes way too much sense! ** -- Diehard Hokie 03/25/2020 11:24AM

Agreed... -- Diehard Hokie 03/25/2020 10:44AM

Wouldn't bet on it. -- vthokieq 03/25/2020 10:51AM

$1 million???? -- BigDave 03/25/2020 11:14AM

People who make more and less don’t always plan well for emergencies -- WestyHokie 03/25/2020 11:21AM

And odds are most that don't really need it would -- vthokieq 03/25/2020 11:22AM

Deciding limit based on % of wealth distribution might be too illuminating -- Synaesthesia 03/25/2020 10:42AM

And many are currently at zero- last year as a reference point is ? ** -- bigbadbird 03/25/2020 10:21AM

Or two years ago if you haven't yet filed this year. ** -- vthokieq 03/25/2020 10:22AM

Optics and politics. -- vthokieq 03/25/2020 10:18AM

Agree, $150K/year in NYC is probably < $75K in many rural towns ** -- TabbHokie 03/25/2020 10:17AM

People who make more and less don’t always plan well for emergencies

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors